Aldgate vs Kudla
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Kudla, SA 5115
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, Kudla wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Kudla |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | $635K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | 4.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | +21.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +63.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Population | 3,471 | 551 |
Aldgate vs Kudla: what the numbers say
For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $635K in Kudla, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and Kudla the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +21.2% in Kudla, so recent momentum favours Kudla, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kudla and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Kudla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 551, roughly 6 times the size of Kudla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kudla for recent price momentum, Kudla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison