Skip to main content

Aldgate vs O'Sullivan Beach

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs O'Sullivan Beach, SA 5166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, O'Sullivan Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateO'Sullivan Beach
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$535K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%3.27%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+12.0%
3-year house growth-+41.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.4%
Population3,4711,844

Aldgate vs O'Sullivan Beach: what the numbers say

On cash flow, O'Sullivan Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.75%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +12.0% in O'Sullivan Beach, so recent momentum favours O'Sullivan Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Aldgate and 1.4% in O'Sullivan Beach, so landlords in Aldgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 1,844, larger than O'Sullivan Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: O'Sullivan Beach for rental income, O'Sullivan Beach for recent price momentum, Aldgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison