Aldgate vs Penfield
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Penfield, SA 5121
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 3, Penfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Penfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | $535K | $610K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Population | 3,471 | 422 |
Aldgate vs Penfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.6M in Aldgate and $1.5M in Penfield, so Penfield is the cheaper entry point, with Aldgate houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $610K in Penfield, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and Penfield the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Aldgate and 1.4% in Penfield, so landlords in Aldgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 422, roughly 8 times the size of Penfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Penfield for a lower purchase price, Aldgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison