Aldgate vs Renown Park
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Renown Park, SA 5008
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 1, Renown Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Renown Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | $485K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,471 | 1,663 |
Aldgate vs Renown Park: what the numbers say
For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $485K in Renown Park, which makes Renown Park the more affordable unit market and Aldgate the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Aldgate and 1.6% in Renown Park, so landlords in Aldgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 1,663, roughly 2.1 times the size of Renown Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aldgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison