Skip to main content

Aldgate vs Salisbury East

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Salisbury East, SA 5109

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, Salisbury East wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateSalisbury East
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$535K$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%4.50%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+16.6%
3-year house growth-+51.5%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.7%
Population3,4719,273

Aldgate vs Salisbury East: what the numbers say

For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $525K in Salisbury East, which makes Salisbury East the more affordable unit market and Aldgate the pricier one.

On cash flow, Salisbury East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 1.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +16.6% in Salisbury East, so recent momentum favours Salisbury East, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Aldgate and 1.7% in Salisbury East, so landlords in Aldgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,273 against 3,471, roughly 2.7 times the size of Aldgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Salisbury East for rental income, Salisbury East for recent price momentum, Aldgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison