Aldgate vs Salisbury Heights
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Salisbury Heights, SA 5109
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 1, Salisbury Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Salisbury Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | 3.46% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | +9.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +53.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| Population | 3,471 | 4,488 |
Aldgate vs Salisbury Heights: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +9.2% in Salisbury Heights, so recent momentum favours Salisbury Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Salisbury Heights and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Salisbury Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Salisbury Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,488 against 3,471, larger than Aldgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Salisbury Heights for recent price momentum, Salisbury Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Salisbury Heights, SA 5109
Open Salisbury Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Salisbury Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison