Skip to main content

Aldgate vs St Peters

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs St Peters, SA 5069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, St Peters wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateSt Peters
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$535K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%1.90%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%-
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+14.3%
3-year house growth-+25.6%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population3,4713,231

Aldgate vs St Peters: what the numbers say

For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $725K in St Peters, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and St Peters the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aldgate leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.90% in St Peters, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +14.3% in St Peters, so recent momentum favours St Peters, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in St Peters and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in St Peters face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 3,231, larger than St Peters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aldgate for rental income, St Peters for recent price momentum, St Peters for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison