Aldgate vs Stepney
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Stepney, SA 5069
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 0, Stepney wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Stepney |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 3.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,471 | 942 |
Aldgate vs Stepney: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Stepney leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.2%.
Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 942, roughly 3.7 times the size of Stepney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stepney for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison