Skip to main content

Aldgate vs Torrensville

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Torrensville, SA 5031

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 1, Torrensville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateTorrensville
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$535K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%4.09%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+9.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%0.1%
Population3,4714,110

Aldgate vs Torrensville: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Torrensville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +9.5% in Torrensville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Torrensville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Torrensville and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Torrensville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Torrensville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,110 against 3,471, larger than Aldgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Torrensville for rental income, Torrensville for recent price momentum, Torrensville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison