Skip to main content

Aldgate vs Underdale

Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Underdale, SA 5032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, Underdale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldgateUnderdale
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$535K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)6.39%4.18%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+10.3%
3-year house growth-+55.3%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.8%
Population3,4712,429

Aldgate vs Underdale: what the numbers say

For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $670K in Underdale, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and Underdale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Underdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.84%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +10.3% in Underdale, so recent momentum favours Underdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Underdale and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Underdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aldgate is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,471 against 2,429, larger than Underdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Underdale for rental income, Underdale for recent price momentum, Underdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison