Skip to main content

Alexander Heights vs Redcliffe

Property investment comparison - Alexander Heights, WA 6064 vs Redcliffe, WA 6104

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexander Heights wins 2, Redcliffe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexander HeightsRedcliffe
Median house price$930K$930K
Median unit price-$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.28%
Gross rental yield (units)5.31%5.65%
1-year house growth+21.1%+19.3%
3-year house growth+76.6%+73.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.4%
Population7,7725,030

Alexander Heights vs Redcliffe: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $930K in Alexander Heights and $930K in Redcliffe.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.1% in Alexander Heights and +19.3% in Redcliffe, so recent momentum favours Alexander Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexander Heights houses are +76.6% and Redcliffe houses +73.5%, so Alexander Heights has compounded faster than Redcliffe over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Redcliffe and 0.9% in Alexander Heights, so landlords in Redcliffe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexander Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,772 against 5,030, larger than Redcliffe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alexander Heights for recent price momentum, Redcliffe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison