Skip to main content

Alexandra Hills vs Bald Hills

Property investment comparison - Alexandra Hills, QLD 4161 vs Bald Hills, QLD 4036

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra Hills wins 3, Bald Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandra HillsBald Hills
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.42%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%2.96%
1-year house growth+16.7%+16.2%
3-year house growth+47.2%+53.3%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.9%
Population16,4727,000

Alexandra Hills vs Bald Hills: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Alexandra Hills and $1.1M in Bald Hills.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.7% in Alexandra Hills and +16.2% in Bald Hills, so recent momentum favours Alexandra Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra Hills houses are +47.2% and Bald Hills houses +53.3%, so Bald Hills has compounded faster than Alexandra Hills over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Alexandra Hills and 0.9% in Bald Hills, so landlords in Alexandra Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,472 against 7,000, roughly 2.4 times the size of Bald Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alexandra Hills for recent price momentum, Alexandra Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison