Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Allansford

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Allansford, VIC 3277

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 2, Allansford wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraAllansford
Median house price$535K$525K
Median unit price-$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%4.97%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%3.59%
1-year house growth+7.9%-4.7%estimate
3-year house growth+7.9%-
Vacancy rate0.9%0.8%
Population2,8011,410

Alexandra vs Allansford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $535K in Alexandra and $525K in Allansford, so Allansford is the cheaper entry point, with Alexandra houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Allansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.97%, compared with 4.19% in Alexandra, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and -4.7% in Allansford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Alexandra, while Allansford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Allansford and 0.9% in Alexandra, so landlords in Allansford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 1,410, larger than Allansford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allansford for rental income, Allansford for a lower purchase price, Alexandra for recent price momentum, Allansford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison