Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Black Range

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Black Range, VIC 3381

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 2, Black Range wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraBlack Range
Median house price$535K-
Median unit price-$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.75%
1-year house growth+7.9%+11.3%
3-year house growth+7.9%+51.8%
Vacancy rate0.9%6.2%
Population2,801274

Alexandra vs Black Range: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 2.70% in Black Range, a gap of 1.49 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +11.3% in Black Range, so recent momentum favours Black Range, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Black Range houses +51.8%, so Black Range has compounded faster than Alexandra over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 6.2% in Black Range, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 274, roughly 10 times the size of Black Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alexandra for rental income, Black Range for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison