Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Cowwarr

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Cowwarr, VIC 3857

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 4, Cowwarr wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraCowwarr
Median house price$535K-
Median unit price-$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%2.63%
1-year house growth+7.9%+18.0%
3-year house growth+7.9%+3.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%6.3%
Population2,801389

Alexandra vs Cowwarr: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 2.45% in Cowwarr, a gap of 1.74 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +18.0% in Cowwarr, so recent momentum favours Cowwarr, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Cowwarr houses +3.6%, so Alexandra has compounded faster than Cowwarr over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 6.3% in Cowwarr, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 389, roughly 7 times the size of Cowwarr; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alexandra for rental income, Cowwarr for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison