Alexandra vs Deep Lead
Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Deep Lead, VIC 3385
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 1, Deep Lead wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alexandra | Deep Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | - |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.19% | 3.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 2,801 | 210 |
Alexandra vs Deep Lead: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.40% in Deep Lead, a gap of 0.79 percentage points.
Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 210, roughly 13 times the size of Deep Lead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alexandra for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison