Alexandra vs Golden Gully
Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Golden Gully, VIC 3555
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 1, Golden Gully wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alexandra | Golden Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $610K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.19% | 4.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | 5.03% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 2,801 | 213 |
Alexandra vs Golden Gully: what the numbers say
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.19% in Alexandra and 4.23% in Golden Gully, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 213, roughly 13 times the size of Golden Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison