Alexandra vs Logan
Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Logan, VIC 3475
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 1, Logan wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alexandra | Logan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | - |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.19% | 2.69% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 2,801 | 59 |
Alexandra vs Logan: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 2.69% in Logan, a gap of 1.50 percentage points.
Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 59, roughly 47 times the size of Logan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alexandra for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison