Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Snake Valley

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Snake Valley, VIC 3351

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 3, Snake Valley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraSnake Valley
Median house price$535K-
Median unit price-$320K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%5.99%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.76%
1-year house growth+7.9%+6.1%
3-year house growth+7.9%-26.8%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.9%
Population2,801820

Alexandra vs Snake Valley: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Snake Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.99%, compared with 4.19% in Alexandra, a gap of 1.80 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +6.1% in Snake Valley, so recent momentum favours Alexandra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Snake Valley houses -26.8%, so Alexandra has compounded faster than Snake Valley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 2.9% in Snake Valley, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 820, roughly 3.4 times the size of Snake Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Snake Valley for rental income, Alexandra for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison