Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Swan Reach

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Swan Reach, VIC 3903

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 4, Swan Reach wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraSwan Reach
Median house price$535K-
Median unit price-$160K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%-
1-year house growth+7.9%+6.1%
3-year house growth+7.9%-18.3%
Vacancy rate0.9%3.2%
Population2,801861

Alexandra vs Swan Reach: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.05% in Swan Reach, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +6.1% in Swan Reach, so recent momentum favours Alexandra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Swan Reach houses -18.3%, so Alexandra has compounded faster than Swan Reach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 3.2% in Swan Reach, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 861, roughly 3.3 times the size of Swan Reach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alexandra for rental income, Alexandra for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison