Skip to main content

Alexandra vs Toora

Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Toora, VIC 3962

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 4, Toora wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlexandraToora
Median house price$535K-
Median unit price-$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.19%4.75%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%2.69%
1-year house growth+7.9%+4.6%
3-year house growth+7.9%-15.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.0%
Population2,801713

Alexandra vs Toora: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Toora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.75%, compared with 4.19% in Alexandra, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +4.6% in Toora, so recent momentum favours Alexandra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Toora houses -15.6%, so Alexandra has compounded faster than Toora over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 1.0% in Toora, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 713, roughly 3.9 times the size of Toora; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Toora for rental income, Alexandra for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison