Alexandra vs Yinnar
Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Yinnar, VIC 3869
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 2, Yinnar wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alexandra | Yinnar |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $355K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.19% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | 5.18% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | +17.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | -15.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,801 | 1,021 |
Alexandra vs Yinnar: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Alexandra and +17.8% in Yinnar, so recent momentum favours Yinnar, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Alexandra houses are +7.9% and Yinnar houses -15.4%, so Alexandra has compounded faster than Yinnar over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Alexandra and 1.2% in Yinnar, so landlords in Alexandra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 1,021, roughly 2.7 times the size of Yinnar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yinnar for recent price momentum, Alexandra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison