Skip to main content

Alfred Cove vs Boya

Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Boya, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 4, Boya wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfred CoveBoya
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$740K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.62%
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%4.81%
1-year house growth+11.9%+11.8%
3-year house growth+59.5%+40.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%5.6%
Population2,830669

Alfred Cove vs Boya: what the numbers say

For units, Alfred Cove sits at a median of $740K against $425K in Boya, which makes Boya the more affordable unit market and Alfred Cove the pricier one.

On cash flow, Boya leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.62%, compared with 3.10% in Alfred Cove, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +11.8% in Boya, so recent momentum favours Alfred Cove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alfred Cove houses are +59.5% and Boya houses +40.9%, so Alfred Cove has compounded faster than Boya over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Alfred Cove and 5.6% in Boya, so landlords in Alfred Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 669, roughly 4.2 times the size of Boya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boya for rental income, Alfred Cove for recent price momentum, Alfred Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison