Alfred Cove vs Hovea
Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Hovea, WA 6071
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 4, Hovea wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfred Cove | Hovea |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $740K | $755K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 1.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.26% | 1.96% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +59.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 9.2% |
| Population | 2,830 | 713 |
Alfred Cove vs Hovea: what the numbers say
For units, Alfred Cove sits at a median of $740K against $755K in Hovea, which makes Alfred Cove the more affordable unit market and Hovea the pricier one.
On cash flow, Alfred Cove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 1.89% in Hovea, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Alfred Cove and 9.2% in Hovea, so landlords in Alfred Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 713, roughly 4.0 times the size of Hovea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alfred Cove for rental income, Alfred Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison