Skip to main content

Alfred Cove vs Lange

Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Lange, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 3, Lange wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfred CoveLange
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$740K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.96%
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%3.58%
1-year house growth+11.9%+18.4%
3-year house growth+59.5%+69.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.6%
Population2,830394

Alfred Cove vs Lange: what the numbers say

For units, Alfred Cove sits at a median of $740K against $750K in Lange, which makes Alfred Cove the more affordable unit market and Lange the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lange leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.96%, compared with 3.10% in Alfred Cove, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +18.4% in Lange, so recent momentum favours Lange, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alfred Cove houses are +59.5% and Lange houses +69.6%, so Lange has compounded faster than Alfred Cove over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Alfred Cove and 2.6% in Lange, so landlords in Alfred Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 394, roughly 7 times the size of Lange; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lange for rental income, Lange for recent price momentum, Alfred Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison