Skip to main content

Alfred Cove vs Oldbury

Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Oldbury, WA 6121

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 2, Oldbury wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfred CoveOldbury
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$740K$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%2.25%
1-year house growth+11.9%+19.3%
3-year house growth+59.5%+62.3%
Vacancy rate1.1%3.4%
Population2,830296

Alfred Cove vs Oldbury: what the numbers say

For units, Alfred Cove sits at a median of $740K against $695K in Oldbury, which makes Oldbury the more affordable unit market and Alfred Cove the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +19.3% in Oldbury, so recent momentum favours Oldbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alfred Cove houses are +59.5% and Oldbury houses +62.3%, so Oldbury has compounded faster than Alfred Cove over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Alfred Cove and 3.4% in Oldbury, so landlords in Alfred Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 296, roughly 10 times the size of Oldbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oldbury for recent price momentum, Alfred Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison