Alfred Cove vs Utakarra
Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Utakarra, WA 6530
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 1, Utakarra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfred Cove | Utakarra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $740K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.26% | 5.53% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.9% | +18.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +59.5% | +33.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 2,830 | 1,467 |
Alfred Cove vs Utakarra: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +18.2% in Utakarra, so recent momentum favours Utakarra, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Alfred Cove houses are +59.5% and Utakarra houses +33.7%, so Alfred Cove has compounded faster than Utakarra over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 1,467, larger than Utakarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Utakarra for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison