Skip to main content

Alfredton vs Blampied

Property investment comparison - Alfredton, VIC 3350 vs Blampied, VIC 3364

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfredton wins 3, Blampied wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfredtonBlampied
Median house price$660K$665K
Median unit price$410K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.78%4.29%
Gross rental yield (units)4.73%-
1-year house growth+10.9%-
3-year house growth+3.1%-
Vacancy rate1.3%1.6%
Population11,822237

Alfredton vs Blampied: what the numbers say

The median house price is $660K in Alfredton and $665K in Blampied, so Alfredton is the cheaper entry point, with Blampied houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Alfredton sits at a median of $410K against $815K in Blampied, which makes Alfredton the more affordable unit market and Blampied the pricier one.

On cash flow, Blampied leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.29%, compared with 3.78% in Alfredton, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Alfredton and 1.6% in Blampied, so landlords in Alfredton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfredton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,822 against 237, roughly 50 times the size of Blampied; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blampied for rental income, Alfredton for a lower purchase price, Alfredton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison