Skip to main content

Alfredton vs Kalkallo

Property investment comparison - Alfredton, VIC 3350 vs Kalkallo, VIC 3064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfredton wins 4, Kalkallo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfredtonKalkallo
Median house price$660K$660K
Median unit price$410K$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.78%4.04%
Gross rental yield (units)4.73%4.24%
1-year house growth+10.9%+2.5%estimate
3-year house growth+3.1%-
Vacancy rate1.3%8.2%
Population11,8225,548

Alfredton vs Kalkallo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $660K in Alfredton and $660K in Kalkallo.

For units, Alfredton sits at a median of $410K against $605K in Kalkallo, which makes Alfredton the more affordable unit market and Kalkallo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kalkallo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.04%, compared with 3.78% in Alfredton, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.9% in Alfredton and +2.5% in Kalkallo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Alfredton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Alfredton and 8.2% in Kalkallo, so landlords in Alfredton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfredton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,822 against 5,548, roughly 2.1 times the size of Kalkallo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kalkallo for rental income, Alfredton for recent price momentum, Alfredton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison