Skip to main content

Alice River vs Burua

Property investment comparison - Alice River, QLD 4817 vs Burua, QLD 4680

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alice River wins 0, Burua wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlice RiverBurua
Median house price$1M$995K
Median unit price$520K$275K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.04%8.43%
1-year house growth+19.8%+21.0%estimate
3-year house growth+39.3%-
Vacancy rate2.4%2.1%
Population2,685849

Alice River vs Burua: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1M in Alice River and $995K in Burua, so Burua is the cheaper entry point, with Alice River houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Alice River sits at a median of $520K against $275K in Burua, which makes Burua the more affordable unit market and Alice River the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.8% in Alice River and +21.0% in Burua (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Burua, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Burua and 2.4% in Alice River, so landlords in Burua face less competition for tenants.

Alice River is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,685 against 849, roughly 3.2 times the size of Burua; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burua for a lower purchase price, Burua for recent price momentum, Burua for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison