Alice River vs Coal Creek
Property investment comparison - Alice River, QLD 4817 vs Coal Creek, QLD 4312
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alice River wins 1, Coal Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alice River | Coal Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | $520K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.73% | 3.51% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.04% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +19.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +39.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Population | 2,685 | 50 |
Alice River vs Coal Creek: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Alice River and $1M in Coal Creek.
On cash flow, Alice River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 3.51% in Coal Creek, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Coal Creek and 2.4% in Alice River, so landlords in Coal Creek face less competition for tenants.
Alice River is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,685 against 50, roughly 54 times the size of Coal Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alice River for rental income, Coal Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison