Skip to main content

Alice River vs Pimpama

Property investment comparison - Alice River, QLD 4817 vs Pimpama, QLD 4209

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alice River wins 2, Pimpama wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlice RiverPimpama
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$520K$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.73%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.04%-
1-year house growth+19.8%+15.6%
3-year house growth+39.3%+46.0%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.1%
Population2,68524,601

Alice River vs Pimpama: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Alice River and $1M in Pimpama.

For units, Alice River sits at a median of $520K against $835K in Pimpama, which makes Alice River the more affordable unit market and Pimpama the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.8% in Alice River and +15.6% in Pimpama, so recent momentum favours Alice River, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alice River houses are +39.3% and Pimpama houses +46.0%, so Pimpama has compounded faster than Alice River over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Pimpama and 2.4% in Alice River, so landlords in Pimpama face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pimpama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,601 against 2,685, roughly 9 times the size of Alice River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alice River for recent price momentum, Pimpama for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison