Alkimos vs Cannington
Property investment comparison - Alkimos, WA 6038 vs Cannington, WA 6107
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alkimos wins 0, Cannington wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alkimos | Cannington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $655K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.18% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +72.9% | +78.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Population | 10,203 | 6,875 |
Alkimos vs Cannington: what the numbers say
Looking back three years, Alkimos houses are +72.9% and Cannington houses +78.0%, so Cannington has compounded faster than Alkimos over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Cannington and 2.0% in Alkimos, so landlords in Cannington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alkimos is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,203 against 6,875, larger than Cannington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cannington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison