Alkimos vs Collingwood Heights
Property investment comparison - Alkimos, WA 6038 vs Collingwood Heights, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alkimos wins 1, Collingwood Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alkimos | Collingwood Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $495K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.30% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.18% | 6.28% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +72.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Population | 10,203 | 694 |
Alkimos vs Collingwood Heights: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Alkimos leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 2.55% in Collingwood Heights, a gap of 1.75 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Collingwood Heights and 2.0% in Alkimos, so landlords in Collingwood Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alkimos is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,203 against 694, roughly 15 times the size of Collingwood Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alkimos for rental income, Collingwood Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Collingwood Heights, WA 6330
Open Collingwood Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Collingwood Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison