Alkimos vs Whitby
Property investment comparison - Alkimos, WA 6038 vs Whitby, WA 6123
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alkimos wins 2, Whitby wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alkimos | Whitby |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $560K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.18% | 6.71% |
| 1-year house growth | +18.2% | +22.0% |
| 3-year house growth | +72.9% | +67.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 4.8% |
| Population | 10,203 | 1,005 |
Alkimos vs Whitby: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +18.2% in Alkimos and +22.0% in Whitby, so recent momentum favours Whitby, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Alkimos houses are +72.9% and Whitby houses +67.7%, so Alkimos has compounded faster than Whitby over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Alkimos and 4.8% in Whitby, so landlords in Alkimos face less competition for tenants.
Alkimos is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,203 against 1,005, roughly 10 times the size of Whitby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Whitby for recent price momentum, Alkimos for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison