Allambee Reserve vs Portland
Property investment comparison - Allambee Reserve, VIC 3871 vs Portland, VIC 3305
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allambee Reserve wins 1, Portland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Allambee Reserve | Portland |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $485K | $490K |
| Median unit price | - | $260K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +18.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +7.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 7.1% | 0.6% |
| Population | 96 | 10,016 |
Allambee Reserve vs Portland: what the numbers say
The median house price is $485K in Allambee Reserve and $490K in Portland, so Allambee Reserve is the cheaper entry point, with Portland houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Portland and 7.1% in Allambee Reserve, so landlords in Portland face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Portland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,016 against 96, roughly 104 times the size of Allambee Reserve; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Allambee Reserve for a lower purchase price, Portland for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Allambee Reserve, VIC 3871
Open Allambee Reserve suburb profileRecent sales in Allambee Reserve
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison