Skip to main content

Allawah vs Thornleigh

Property investment comparison - Allawah, NSW 2218 vs Thornleigh, NSW 2120

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allawah wins 1, Thornleigh wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllawahThornleigh
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$840K$795K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.45%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.26%4.70%
1-year house growth-2.9%estimate-4.7%
3-year house growth--4.4%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.7%
Population5,3518,898

Allawah vs Thornleigh: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Allawah and $1.9M in Thornleigh.

For units, Allawah sits at a median of $840K against $795K in Thornleigh, which makes Thornleigh the more affordable unit market and Allawah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Thornleigh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.52%, compared with 2.45% in Allawah, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.9% in Allawah (an estimate) and -4.7% in Thornleigh, so recent momentum favours Allawah, while Thornleigh went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Thornleigh and 1.5% in Allawah, so landlords in Thornleigh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thornleigh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,898 against 5,351, larger than Allawah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thornleigh for rental income, Allawah for recent price momentum, Thornleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison