Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Back Valley

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Back Valley, SA 5211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 2, Back Valley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensBack Valley
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%2.53%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.86%
1-year house growth+8.0%-
3-year house growth+33.1%-
Vacancy rate0.3%2.4%
Population2,045176

Allenby Gardens vs Back Valley: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $605K in Back Valley, which makes Back Valley the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

On cash flow, Allenby Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.53% in Back Valley, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 2.4% in Back Valley, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenby Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,045 against 176, roughly 12 times the size of Back Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenby Gardens for rental income, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison