Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Fullarton

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Fullarton, SA 5063

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 2, Fullarton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensFullarton
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+8.0%-
3-year house growth+33.1%-
Vacancy rate0.3%0.9%
Population2,0454,500

Allenby Gardens vs Fullarton: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $860K in Fullarton, which makes Fullarton the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

On cash flow, Allenby Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.65% in Fullarton, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.9% in Fullarton, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fullarton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,500 against 2,045, roughly 2.2 times the size of Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenby Gardens for rental income, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison