Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Mitchell Park

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Mitchell Park, SA 5043

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Mitchell Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensMitchell Park
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.59%
1-year house growth+8.0%+9.5%
3-year house growth+33.1%+50.5%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.4%
Population2,0455,754

Allenby Gardens vs Mitchell Park: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $630K in Mitchell Park, which makes Mitchell Park the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +9.5% in Mitchell Park, so recent momentum favours Mitchell Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Mitchell Park houses +50.5%, so Mitchell Park has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.3%.

Mitchell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,754 against 2,045, roughly 2.8 times the size of Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mitchell Park for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison