Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Myrtle Bank

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Myrtle Bank, SA 5064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 2, Myrtle Bank wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensMyrtle Bank
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+8.0%+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth+33.1%-
Vacancy rate0.3%0.5%
Population2,0453,158

Allenby Gardens vs Myrtle Bank: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $760K in Myrtle Bank, which makes Myrtle Bank the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

On cash flow, Allenby Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.52% in Myrtle Bank, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +11.8% in Myrtle Bank (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Myrtle Bank, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.5% in Myrtle Bank, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Myrtle Bank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,158 against 2,045, larger than Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenby Gardens for rental income, Myrtle Bank for recent price momentum, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison