Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Osborne

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Osborne, SA 5017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Osborne wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensOsborne
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%3.91%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.38%
1-year house growth+8.0%+10.9%
3-year house growth+33.1%+43.4%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.9%
Population2,0451,951

Allenby Gardens vs Osborne: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Osborne leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.91%, compared with 3.28% in Allenby Gardens, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +10.9% in Osborne, so recent momentum favours Osborne, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Osborne houses +43.4%, so Osborne has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.9% in Osborne, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenby Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,045 against 1,951, larger than Osborne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Osborne for rental income, Osborne for recent price momentum, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison