Allenby Gardens vs Panorama
Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Panorama, SA 5041
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Panorama wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Allenby Gardens | Panorama |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $920K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.28% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.0% | +8.0% |
| 3-year house growth | +33.1% | +37.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Population | 2,045 | 2,388 |
Allenby Gardens vs Panorama: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Allenby Gardens and $1.2M in Panorama, so Allenby Gardens is the cheaper entry point, with Panorama houses about 4% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in both suburbs.
Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Panorama houses +37.1%, so Panorama has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.3%.
Panorama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,388 against 2,045, larger than Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Allenby Gardens for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Allenby Gardens, SA 5009
Open Allenby Gardens suburb profileRecent sales in Allenby Gardens
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison