Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Sefton Park

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Sefton Park, SA 5083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 2, Sefton Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensSefton Park
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.50%
1-year house growth+8.0%+9.5%
3-year house growth+33.1%+20.2%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.6%
Population2,0451,274

Allenby Gardens vs Sefton Park: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +9.5% in Sefton Park, so recent momentum favours Sefton Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Sefton Park houses +20.2%, so Allenby Gardens has compounded faster than Sefton Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 0.6% in Sefton Park, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenby Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,045 against 1,274, larger than Sefton Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sefton Park for recent price momentum, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison