Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Sellicks Hill

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Sellicks Hill, SA 5174

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 3, Sellicks Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensSellicks Hill
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$920K$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%1.99%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.22%
1-year house growth+8.0%-
3-year house growth+33.1%-
Vacancy rate0.3%2.9%
Population2,045299

Allenby Gardens vs Sellicks Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Allenby Gardens and $1.2M in Sellicks Hill, so Allenby Gardens is the cheaper entry point, with Sellicks Hill houses about 6% dearer.

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $335K in Sellicks Hill, which makes Sellicks Hill the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

On cash flow, Allenby Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 1.99% in Sellicks Hill, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 2.9% in Sellicks Hill, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenby Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,045 against 299, roughly 7 times the size of Sellicks Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenby Gardens for rental income, Allenby Gardens for a lower purchase price, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison