Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Willow Creek

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Willow Creek, SA 5211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 3, Willow Creek wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensWillow Creek
Median house price$1.2M$1.3M
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%2.53%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+8.0%-
3-year house growth+33.1%-
Vacancy rate0.3%2.4%
Population2,04548

Allenby Gardens vs Willow Creek: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Allenby Gardens and $1.3M in Willow Creek, so Allenby Gardens is the cheaper entry point, with Willow Creek houses about 7% dearer.

On cash flow, Allenby Gardens leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.53% in Willow Creek, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Allenby Gardens and 2.4% in Willow Creek, so landlords in Allenby Gardens face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenby Gardens is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,045 against 48, roughly 43 times the size of Willow Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenby Gardens for rental income, Allenby Gardens for a lower purchase price, Allenby Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison