Skip to main content

Allenby Gardens vs Woodcroft

Property investment comparison - Allenby Gardens, SA 5009 vs Woodcroft, SA 5162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenby Gardens wins 1, Woodcroft wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenby GardensWoodcroft
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price$920K$340K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.25%
1-year house growth+8.0%+11.1%
3-year house growth+33.1%+38.3%
Vacancy rate0.3%0.4%
Population2,04511,326

Allenby Gardens vs Woodcroft: what the numbers say

For units, Allenby Gardens sits at a median of $920K against $340K in Woodcroft, which makes Woodcroft the more affordable unit market and Allenby Gardens the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Allenby Gardens and +11.1% in Woodcroft, so recent momentum favours Woodcroft, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenby Gardens houses are +33.1% and Woodcroft houses +38.3%, so Woodcroft has compounded faster than Allenby Gardens over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.3%.

Woodcroft is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,326 against 2,045, roughly 6 times the size of Allenby Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodcroft for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison