Skip to main content

Allenstown vs Mossman

Property investment comparison - Allenstown, QLD 4700 vs Mossman, QLD 4873

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Allenstown wins 4, Mossman wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAllenstownMossman
Median house price$535K$550K
Median unit price-$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.89%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.06%
1-year house growth+15.3%+8.5%
3-year house growth+66.1%+18.4%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.5%
Population2,7621,935

Allenstown vs Mossman: what the numbers say

The median house price is $535K in Allenstown and $550K in Mossman, so Allenstown is the cheaper entry point, with Mossman houses about 3% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Allenstown and +8.5% in Mossman, so recent momentum favours Allenstown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Allenstown houses are +66.1% and Mossman houses +18.4%, so Allenstown has compounded faster than Mossman over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Allenstown and 1.5% in Mossman, so landlords in Allenstown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Allenstown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,762 against 1,935, larger than Mossman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Allenstown for a lower purchase price, Allenstown for recent price momentum, Allenstown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison