Skip to main content

Alonnah vs Glenorchy

Property investment comparison - Alonnah, TAS 7150 vs Glenorchy, TAS 7010

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alonnah wins 3, Glenorchy wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlonnahGlenorchy
Median house price$650K$655K
Median unit price$415K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.75%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.15%
1-year house growth+6.3%+15.2%
3-year house growth+19.0%+9.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%0.8%
Population16412,013

Alonnah vs Glenorchy: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Alonnah and $655K in Glenorchy, so Alonnah is the cheaper entry point, with Glenorchy houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Alonnah sits at a median of $415K against $490K in Glenorchy, which makes Alonnah the more affordable unit market and Glenorchy the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Alonnah and +15.2% in Glenorchy, so recent momentum favours Glenorchy, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alonnah houses are +19.0% and Glenorchy houses +9.4%, so Alonnah has compounded faster than Glenorchy over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Glenorchy and 2.4% in Alonnah, so landlords in Glenorchy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenorchy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,013 against 164, roughly 73 times the size of Alonnah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alonnah for a lower purchase price, Glenorchy for recent price momentum, Glenorchy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison