Skip to main content

Alstonvale vs Burradoo

Property investment comparison - Alstonvale, NSW 2477 vs Burradoo, NSW 2576

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alstonvale wins 3, Burradoo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlstonvaleBurradoo
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$635K$1.6M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.81%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.45%-
1-year house growth--5.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.7%3.0%
Population4312,879

Alstonvale vs Burradoo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Alstonvale and $2.3M in Burradoo, so Alstonvale is the cheaper entry point, with Burradoo houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Alstonvale sits at a median of $635K against $1.6M in Burradoo, which makes Alstonvale the more affordable unit market and Burradoo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Burradoo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.50%, compared with 1.81% in Alstonvale, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Alstonvale and 3.0% in Burradoo, so landlords in Alstonvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burradoo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,879 against 431, roughly 7 times the size of Alstonvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Burradoo for rental income, Alstonvale for a lower purchase price, Alstonvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison